Off-Prem

Channel

Salesperson's tech dream delivered by ill-equipped consultant who charged for the inevitable fix

‘I had a sharp new suit and a misplaced sense of confidence’ – and made a costly mistake


Who,Me? Before you shell out big bucks to engage the services of consultants, perhaps consider this week’s instalment of Who, Me? and the adventures of a reader we’ll call “Norman” for the duration of this tale.

Towards the end of the 2000s, Norman left an in-house software development “join the ranks of The Consultants.”

“My tech credentials were solid… assuming that is The Consultancy put me on projects that actually required them,” Norman explained.

And indeed, on his first job as a Consultant he was asked to work on “a technology that I had at best a passing experience in: - Microsoft Exchange.

The Consultancy didn’t much care that he wasn’t an Exchange expert. In Norman’s telling of the tale “The salespeople had done a great job of selling The Dream and it was of marginal consequence to them that I had virtually no idea what I was doing and certainly not the experience to foresee some of the things that could go wrong”

“I had a sharp new suit and a misplaced sense of confidence and superiority though, so I was ready.”

Norman’s consultancy task was to write a service that monitored an Exchange mailbox and forward certain messages to a document management system.

“The business logic was reasonably simple - if the email provided the required information in a specified format then it was sent on to DMS; if the required info was missing then the email was bounced to the sender with a helpful error message.”

Norman wrote the required code, which “flew through user acceptance testing with flying colours and was gaily deployed to Production.”

Until it broke.

Norman had long since been redeployed, but as luck would have it was still at the same client.

He could therefore observe “absolute pandemonium as what seemed like the entire IT team running about wildly complaining that their entire Exchange infrastructure was on its knees, and nobody could get any email.”

This was not Norman’s problem. But as the IT team triaged the mess, he overheard a phrase that suggested the mailbox processing service he’d built could be the culprit.

A little investigation proved his work was indeed the cause of the problem – but not because Norman had messed up.

That honour went to a business unit at Norman’s client, which had created a new automated process that sent emails to the mailbox being monitored by the service he built. But the automated process misconfigured the emails, so the required info was missing and added an auto responder on the mailbox they were using to send the emails.

Thus a game of autoresponder tennis had ensued.

“Their mailbox had sent an ‘invalid’ mail to my mailbox,” Norman explained. “My service had found the message and bounced it back. And their autoresponder responded with an equally invalid message. My service responded.”

And how it responded! Instead of just removing incoming messages from the mailbox it bounced them. This meant that every time Norman’s service ran, it not only processed the latest mail … and all the prior messages.

Norman described the result as “an exponential mailbox timebomb that was enough to completely overwhelm the entire environment.”

Norman fixed the problem by pausing the mailbox monitoring service, purging the target mailbox, and temporarily disabling the autoresponder on the other mailbox.

With that done he was triumphant. “I had successfully resolved the issue… that my code had created,” he admitted.

And then he had another win. “The Consultancy rustled up another hefty sale in the form of the required ‘change request’ to implement a two-line code fix to prevent this from happening again.”

Ain’t consultancy grand?

If you’ve ever charged a customer to make them pay for your own mistake, or paid to fix a consultant’s incompetence, tell all with an email to Who, Me? ®

Send us news
56 Comments

Final cumulative update for Exchange Server 2019 lands at last

End of the road in sight for venerable server

Untrained techie botched a big hardware sale by breaking client's ERP

'If I wasn't already taking blood pressure meds, I'm sure I would not have survived'

Techie pointed out meetings are pointless, and was punished for it

When asked to offer honest feedback, maybe pause to ponder how well you play office politics

Microsoft's final Exchange Server 2019 update still missing as support deadline ticks down

CU15 MIA as Redmond scrambles to fix issues

Does this thing run on a 220 V power supply? Oh. That puff of smoke suggests not

That's not even the worst part of this story, which features a flood, broken promises, and plenty of panic

CompSci teacher sets lab task: Accidentally breaking the university

Hey! Teacher! Leave our network alone!

Exchange update refusenik? Consider yourself warned by Microsoft

If you have a 'significantly out of date' Exchange Server, emergency mitigation might stop working

Tired techie botched preventative maintenance he soon learned wasn't needed

Epic late-night road trip would have been awesome if not for a secret change of plans

The channel stands corrected: Hardware is a refresh cycle business now

'For 30 years you thought you were business geniuses,' veteran analyst tells resellers and distributors

Developers feared large chaps carrying baseball bats could come to kneecap their ... test account?

A whole different kind of 'technical debt' turned into real-world trouble

Life lesson: Don't delete millions of accounts on the same day you go to the dentist

Or ignore documentation that warns you are about to do something dangerous

Microsoft invites Chinese software vendors to sell on its marketplace and through its partners

Good luck getting buyers and resellers excited about that